Friday, December 23, 2011

Gambatte, Sensei!!! Thoughts on 1 Corinthians 12

Hullo Guys,


I wrote this to a couple of friends last night in a fit of inspiration, and at the behest of our Associate Elder (Pastoral) i.e. Janice Liu of the Huang Clan, I am putting it up now for the rest of the church


------ Post Content Begins After This -------


I'm writing this at this weird hour of the day because of a conversation I just had and I felt that I shouldn't keep this to myself any longer, but should share it so that, perhaps, I can start the ball rolling in several directions within the Pentecostal community (even if the ball does not end up rolling very far, HAHAHA).


The conversation included a bit on the things of the Spirit (since I'm on this, I might as well just eschew the use of the term 'gift' altogether, which also should be included in charismata as well - but that's another story for another time). One question arose was, why does Paul divide the words of knowledge and wisdom from prophecy, and as I prepared to answer the question I realised that I hold to a completely different reading of knowledge and wisdom here than the majority (if not all) of the Pentecostal/Charismatic world, and let me go on record that I cannot see how the standard explanation of what knowledge and wisdom are can be correct in any way. To put it baldly, I think the standard explanation of knowledge and wisdom in 1 Corinthians is just Plain Wrong.


Standard Explanation: word of knowledge is an uncanny, supernatural articulation of a bit of knowledge about a person or situation. So.....


Chris (praying for Janice): '......you're a girl!'

Janice: 'Oh my god! You must have had a word of knowledge!'


Likewise, the word of wisdom is a message of supernatural wisdom to handle difficult situations


Janice: 'I don't know what to do with the kitchen sink!'

Chris: '...I sense you should sell it to the karang guni.'

Janice: 'Oh my god, that is so wise, you must have had a word of wisdom!'

Chris: 'Nah, it’s just the nature of the turn.'


Ok, now what is wrong with this picture? Two related things....


One, Knowledge and Wisdom are key, almost technical, terms in the First Epistle to the Corinthians.


Most theologically-trained Pentecostals and Charismatics seem to forget this when preaching about the things of the Spirit, for some reason. Surely the fact that 'knowledge' and 'wisdom' are terms of controversy within the Corinthian context should tell us that no reading of the two words (of knowledge and wisdom) can be complete or stable without factoring in the controversy.


Two, Paul Actually Explains what the terms signify.


The opening chapters of the letter makes it very clear: when Paul uses the term 'wisdom' he is using it to refer to the 'mystery' of the gospel that God 'determined before the ages', and this in contrast to the 'wisdom' (i.e. worldview and value system) of the world. An example of how divine wisdom works is God choosing the poor and the marginalised of the world as heirs of the gospel - hmm...nothing here about kitchen sinks!


Similarly, when Paul speaks of knowledge, he is speaking of the knowledge of God. Fee, after all, is arguing that Paul does so knowing of the proto-Gnostic elements of Hellenic thought and is indirectly attacking the elitist idea of exclusive knowledge of the divine/metaphysical realm that was pervasive in Hellenic religions.


So, here is my take:


1. The word of wisdom is a divinely inspired message that expounds and explicates an element of the gospel that the human mind does not instinctively or naturally (!) grasp. Think of it as a cross between the ministry of prophecy and teaching. Paul demonstrates an example in the letter itself, I think: he talks about God choosing the weak and the foolish things of this world to confound the wise - something the mind does not naturally take to, but which revelation teaches.


2. The word of knowledge is a divinely inspired message that reveals something of the character and the nature of God not merely in an intellectual way but which carries with it power to cut to the heart and make the revelation real. Think of the Greek gnosis, except in this case, Christian, and the genuine form.


Where does prophecy fit in then? Well, from Paul's comments in 1 Cor, I am inclined to think of it as being in some way more corrective than the two: it 'reveals the secrets of men's hearts' cf Rev 1-2


Chris

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Proverbs VS Ecclesiastes

Are you in trouble? Proverbs 5 goes like this:


Listen, my sons, to a father’s instruction;
   pay attention and gain understanding.
2 I give you sound learning,
   so do not forsake my teaching.
3 For I too was a son to my father,
   still tender, and cherished by my mother.
4 Then he taught me, and he said to me,
   “Take hold of my words with all your heart;
   keep my commands, and you will live.
5 Get wisdom, get understanding;
   do not forget my words or turn away from them.
6 Do not forsake wisdom, and she will protect you;
   love her, and she will watch over you.
7 The beginning of wisdom is this: Get[a] wisdom.
   Though it cost all you have,[b] get understanding.
8 Cherish her, and she will exalt you;
   embrace her, and she will honor you.
9 She will give you a garland to grace your head
   and present you with a glorious crown.” 


What's the use of wisdom? Think of wisdom as being able to do the right thing at the right time. Or knowing the right methods to use. Many purposes -- just to name a few:


1) Keeps you from getting into unnecessary trouble: "When you walk, your steps will not be hampered; when you run, you will not stumble."
2) Keeps you from getting success at the expense/decay of the person within. You won't fight so hard for short-run success, only to let everything go through your grasp:
 

14 Do not set foot on the path of the wicked
   or walk in the way of evildoers...

 18 The path of the righteous is like the morning sun,    shining ever brighter till the full light of day.
19 But the way of the wicked is like deep darkness;
   they do not know what makes them stumble. 


3) Keeps you keeping on (perseverance): without it, no one survives life--
 25 Let your eyes look straight ahead;
   fix your gaze directly before you.
26 Give careful thought to the[c] paths for your feet
   and be steadfast in all your ways.
 

On the other hand, the writer of Ecclesiastes says: Wisdom Is Meaningless

 12 I, the Teacher, was king over Israel in Jerusalem. 13 I applied my mind to study and to explore by wisdom all that is done under the heavens. What a heavy burden God has laid on mankind! 14 I have seen all the things that are done under the sun; all of them are meaningless, a chasing after the wind.
He then goes on to list the problems in the world:
1) The love for the status quo: 
15 What is crooked cannot be straightened;
   what is lacking cannot be counted.


2) Pain. Human dissatisfaction, frustration, just the sense that there should be something more. The more he saw, the more he realised the world needed change:
 18 For with much wisdom comes much sorrow;
   the more knowledge, the more grief.


So new problem: dealing with pain. How? His ways of dealing with it are so similar to us:
i) Have fun, live for the moment--

"I said to myself, “Come now, I will test you with pleasure to find out what is good.” But that also proved to be meaningless. 2 “Laughter,” I said, “is madness. And what does pleasure accomplish?” 3 I tried cheering myself with wine, and embracing folly—my mind still guiding me with wisdom. I wanted to see what was good for people to do under the heavens during the few days of their lives."

I think Solomon didn't bother stating how this doesn't work, because the answer is so obvious--the gnawing feeling of emptiness doesn't stop with a good comedy night or an entertaining YouTube video.


ii) Work super duper hard. Be a workaholic, accomplish a lot, have a great name, have lots of titles and accolades that others do not have.

 4 I undertook great projects: I built houses for myself and planted vineyards. 5 I made gardens and parks and planted all kinds of fruit trees in them. 6 I made reservoirs to water groves of flourishing trees. 7 I bought male and female slaves and had other slaves who were born in my house. I also owned more herds and flocks than anyone in Jerusalem before me. 8 I amassed silver and gold for myself, and the treasure of kings and provinces. I acquired male and female singers, and a harem[a] as well—the delights of a man’s heart. 9 I became greater by far than anyone in Jerusalem before me...
 10 I denied myself nothing my eyes desired;
   I refused my heart no pleasure.
My heart took delight in all my labor,
   and this was the reward for all my toil.
11 Yet when I surveyed all that my hands had done
   and what I had toiled to achieve,
everything was meaningless, a chasing after the wind;
   nothing was gained under the sun."

So the pain persists. This drives him to philosophy: what's so good about being so smart?


 12 Then I turned my thoughts to consider wisdom,
   and also madness and folly.
What more can the king’s successor do
   than what has already been done?
13 I saw that wisdom is better than folly,
   just as light is better than darkness.
14 The wise have eyes in their heads,
   while the fool walks in the darkness;
but I came to realize
   that the same fate overtakes them both.  15 Then I said to myself,
   “The fate of the fool will overtake me also.
   What then do I gain by being wise?”
I said to myself,
   “This too is meaningless.”
16 For the wise, like the fool, will not be long remembered;
   the days have already come when both have been forgotten.
Like the fool, the wise too must die!

Death is the great nullifier. My goodness. So what if you did everything right? It is easily forgotten and probably won't seem like much in your older years.

------
I think God deliberately put the books of Proverbs and Ecclesiastes so close together as embodiments of life experience. I wanna suggest that God intends for us to take away a few lessons from the fact that these books are side by side.

1) You can't take one book without the other.

The God of the Proverbs is the God of Ecclesiastes. Proverbs says, "If you follow my instructions, you'll have a successful time." Today we have many nuggets of wisdom all over the place. We've got career advice, advice to deal with our emotions, advice to deal with our families etc. That's the attitude of Proverbs: proven good advice from people with real-world experience.

And you need to take this advice, both within the Scriptures and those from common wisdom.  Take it from someone who believes in the sovereignty of God and who believes that ultimately God empowers his people to do good (rather than your own ability). But you still need to take the advice. I summarise it in one statement: life is hard enough. Don't make it harder. :P You will already need God's grace to deal with the normal problems in life/personal weaknesses. You don't wanna do additional damage control.

Some people get into deep deep trouble. The good thing is, they end up crying out to God to help them. That is something that ultimately means a lot to God. So I applaud that. What these people need to realise is that while God gives grace (and no mess is too permanent that God cannot handle), the solution ain't no microwave dinner or instant noodles either. It is a long, protracted pain.

Now if you know that, then I'm going to say something that seems to contradict. Knowing that both the laws of Proverbs and Ecclesiastes apply, you soon get the idea that no one can realistically follow ALL the advice at one time (you can't even REMEMBER all the advice at one time). So you can only do your best to minimise the slip-ups, but the slip-ups do come.

The further implications of this is that you can't expect to be successful/have a balanced life all the time. And even if you were wise, the world won't let you go. (Other people won't let you go.) Bad things happen to good people. You could have the best advice, do the right things, and still end up not getting what you deserve.

So the moral of the story for pt 1 is: following Proverbs does not guarantee success. Expect it to fail sometimes. BUT if you don't follow the Proverbs way, you are guarantee plus chop going to fail. So follow the Proverbs way, so that God won't just be a medicine you take in the bad times.

2) Life can be quite unfair. Some who are successful, get there even though they did all the wrong things. Stinks, doesn't it.

Acceptance is key to the unfairness in life. God will give you the capacity to accept unfairness. Why should you accept it? This actually leads me to point 3.

3) The world is as described in Ecclesiastes because it is quite corrupted beyond belief. Economically, idologically, politically, in society, in the familial sphere, you name it, you have it. Yes, I think we should look on the bright side, do our best, hope for the best, believe in people, keep hope, etc. But it looks like increased technology, better methods, and all the new buzz-words we create don't do much to solve the human problems since 4000 years ago. People still have to find a way to numb the pain: obsess in work, in fun, in drowning out sorrows etc. Or, stop wishing for the best, and start being "realistic". (Whatever that means.)

So I think it's high time we accept what the Bible says:
i) This world is quite corrupt, despite our best intentions and our attempts to set things right.

ii) Solution? The 2nd coming of Christ. Yep, you got me right. Things ain't going to change until Maranatha--until the Lord comes back soon!
So we can accept unfairness, because it is purely temporary, a speck in the brilliant rainbow of eternity.

iii) Because the damage is so irreversible, grace is so important. We don't have to be bleak and all. God's grace ensures we will triumph over the world.

"Greater is he that is in us, than he that is in the world."

Jesus said: "Take courage! I have overcome the world."

John said: "I am talking to you, young people, because you are strong, and the word of God lives in you, and you have overcome the evil one." (1 John 2:14)

Grace means it's undeserved. Which also means it's sudden, unpredictable, and unlike your rights, not something you can demand from God. (It's something you can request for though.) And which means it's got everything to do with how good God is, not how right or how wise you are. A good recipient of grace knows that he or she can never boast about it, or worse, teach "how to receive it" (which usually is code for "how to earn it").

I want you also to notice that there is no overcoming unless there is something (big) to overcome. So don't be surprised when the world is so corrupt or full of trouble. It's normal. But you will OVERCOME.

4) Stop putting hope in the world. Put hope in Christ.

i) Seek first the Kingdom;
ii) Seek ONLY the Kingdom;
iii) Seek for the treasure that will last;
iv) Seek the pearl of great price;
v) Keep your mind on things above;
vi) Live an honourable life;
vii) Let his face shine on you

...and you will have arrived.

--------
I'll find another chance to post my personal experience that led to this reflection. But all I know is that during the crisis, I couldn't think straight or find a way out. It would be an understatement to say that I was quite in despair. The biggest issue was making sense of my pain and bewilderment, and being honestly shocked and surprised that the world is this way.

I hope this is an encouragement to those who know what it's like to walk in my shoes, or who are walking in it right now. This is a world we constantly have to wake up to. God doesn't often strike in with a magic solution (believe me, I wish he had). But his grace unexplainably sees us through. We're not unharmed, but the victory is found in the fact that we still hope in Christ. In an increasingly broken world, faith in God itself is a very quiet miracle.

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

My turn to give a testimony

Just wanna give thanks to God for something quite extraordinary that happened last week (7 Nov 10). Jan and I were preaching at the Maranatha youth group, and were sharing about being open to the Spirit and letting church not be "church as usual".

During the altar call, we were ministering to different people, and God was touching different individuals as usual. I was praying for the pastor's daughter, and during the prayer, I spoke in tongues as was prompted to by the Lord. What was unexpected was that the pastor's daughter understood the tongues I spoke!--what happened is that she had been in Europe for 3-6 months, travelling to different places, and she herself knew how to speak Dutch. So she came to ask me after the service whether I actually knew Dutch. I told her that I knew German, but not a word of Dutch. So she then told me that during the time I was speaking in tongues, I was actually speaking in a known language, i.e. Dutch! Something about "you are loved by the Lord" (and another phrase which I cannot remember, need to go and ask her again). I was indeed very shocked. I know about the interpretation of tongues, but this is the first time for me to experience the Spirit speaking in a known language. Hehehehe. Very shocked and in amazement. Truly, the Lord's works include "signs and wonders"--"wonders" meaning things that just leave you in amazement!

Sunday, September 26, 2010

From Jan: Vision during Service- 26 Sep 2010

26 September 2010. Today, during church service, as Yan Ying was praying, I saw a vision of a little girl running/playing. This girl seemed to represent me…I felt that the girl is like me. And in the background it was daytime…it was a place like a playground or a piece of empty space for playing. There were trees around and I could hear the sound of children laughing and screaming as they were playing in the background. It is hard to describe the exact sound, but it definitely was the sound of children having fun. I didn’t see them, but I could hear them. When Yan Ying was praying about the rain, she said how as the rain comes, we need to prepare umbrellas in anticipation of the coming rain. Uncannily, Chris already intended from the onset of our time of prayer/worship to sing the song, "Send Your Rain". A thought came to my mind: the reason why the children were laughing the way they did was because they were playing in the rain.

It was a very vivid vision. I really felt as if I was at the playground, and when it ended I opened my eyes and I was quite shocked to be back in reality in church.

What I took away from the vision is: We are childlike before the Father, but not childish.

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Some thoughts from Richard Hays...

I love this snippet from Richard Hays. The context of the quote is an interview that Hays' student did with him, and the question is about Richard Hays' fantastic book about ethics in the New Testament. Apparently, Richard Hays argues that the New Testament does not see the concept of love as a centre that can unify what the entire New Testament has to say about ethical behaviour.

Well, I won't state my stand outright now, but below is the interview question, as well as Hays' interesting and potentially provocative response.

Richard B. Hays is the George Washington Ivey Professor of New Testament at Duke University. He read for a B.A. in English and an M.Div. in New Testament from Yale University, and received his Ph.D. from Emory University.
__________________________________________________________________

A question submitted by one of my readers: Richard Burridge in his Imitating Jesus criticizes your Moral Vision of the NT for a “too easy dismissal of love as a key element for NT ethics” (p359). How would you respond to Burridge specifically, and what role do you see “love” having in NT ethics?

Richard, like some other readers, has not quite grasped my point about “love.” I was not saying that love is unimportant, or that I’m somehow opposed to it! I was saying that “love” cannot function as a focal image or common denominator to bring the diverse NT witnesses into a relation of unity. There are two reasons for this: (1) several of the major NT writings have very little to say about love (Mark, Acts, Hebrews, Revelation); (2) “love” by itself is a concept, not an image; it must be given narrative specification by the story of the cross. (That is why I propose the cross as one of three focal images for NT ethics, along with community and new creation.) Otherwise, “love” cannot be distinguished from whatever the Beatles vaguely meant when they sang, “All you need is love.” [I hasten to add that I am a great Beatles fan and was delighted to receive as a Christmas present the new remastered complete anthology of their recordings.] It seems to me that Richard Burridge’s book exemplifies precisely the problem I am worried about, because for him “love” turns out to be equivalent to the uncritical inclusion of everyone. (I am of course painting with a broad brush.) My fuller comments on his book are forthcoming soon in a review essay that will appear in the Scottish Journal of Theology.

Love is of course of central importance in several NT writings, especially the Pauline Letters, the Gospel of John, and 1 John. I certainly believe that Christians are called to love because God first loved us in Jesus Christ. And this calling has enormous significance for NT ethics. But if we are looking for a synthetic image that can account for how the diverse NT writings hang together, love won’t do the job. Another way of putting the point is that Burridge conflates the synthetic task of NT ethics with the hermeneutical task, with the result that “love” becomes a trump card that overrides the prophetic and critical witness of NT texts less congenial to Burridge’s (generally laudable) concerns.

Sunday, January 24, 2010

A Song We Must All Remember

This is a Vineyard song, which lyrics are always coaxing me, prodding me out of my shell. I think it's a song The Outreach must never forget. It's called "Resting Place".

Heaven is My throne, the earth is My footstool;
where is the house you will build for Me?
Whom of you will hear the cry of My heart?
Where will my resting place be?

Here, O LORD, have I prepared for You a home;
long have I desired for You to dwell.
Here,
O LORD, have I prepared a resting place;
and here,
O LORD, I wait for You alone.

Selah...

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Message from Theologian In Residence

Hallo Hallo,

You'll be happy to know that I am thinking of your BI notes, and will sit down to write them soon...and I am rather confident of this seeing how I seem to be writing a lot of theology-related stuff recently for people, haha. I just sent a long email about the Trinity to my friend, and have started an email series for my Covenant Evangelical Free Church cell group about the similarities and differences between Catholics and Protestants. And I am loving it; although I really, really like what I'm studying now, I do find myself wishing I was studying theology instead, heh.

Anyway, before I put up your BI notes, I am going to embark on another project first. I am thinking of writing a post on revival - basically, it will about what revival really is from a New Testament perspective (and yes, by saying that, I Am saying that a lot of preachers give really inadequate definitions of it).

But as part of that project, I also do want to hear what questions you guys have about this thing that so many Pentecostal and Charismatic churches call "revival". I plan to dedicate a significant part of my post to a Q&A about the topic of revival; so please go ahead and use the comments link to post your questions. Fire away! Don't hold back. No question too big...or controversial :D Questions will be gathered one week from now and be answered promptly.

So, what's on your mind? :)